BARACK OBAMA,
NOBEL PEACE LAUREATE:
WHATEVER HAPPENED TO AWARDING
FOR DEEDS ACTUALLY DONE?
I am generally a supporter of Barack Obama. I voted for him and
campaigned in print for his election. However, as I turned on CNN early
this morning and saw the news that he'd been awarded the Nobel Peace
Prize, I actually gasped in disbelief. Twitter, Facebook and YouTube
videos were destined to be in overdrive, not to mention the texts on
millions of BlackBerrys.
As the 2 a.m. PDT CNN commentator interviewed Norwegian experts and
past Peace Laureates, just about all of them repeated the obvious:
Obama was being honored for the hope of what he might accomplish as
opposed to what he has actually achieved.
The
Nobel Peace Committee has been accused in the past of trying to make a
political statement, and perhaps, because they admire Obama and his
groundbreaking presidency, in addition to his earlier anti-war
statements and recent speech to the Muslim world, they are, by this
action, hoping to jump start his ending the wars in Iraq and
Afghanistan.
Why else give him the honor now? Whatever one might feel about
Obama, he has not earned this singular award. Few American presidents
have received it and of those who have it was bestowed after they'd
been engaged in something special. Theodore Roosevelt had helped to
negotiate peace in the Russo-Japanese War. Woodrow Wilson had
tirelessly worked for the creation of the League of Nations -- a
struggle that was blamed for causing the serious stroke he suffered,
which left him disengaged in the last years of his presidency.
Jimmy Carter received the Peace Prize after he left office, but in
the wake of huge achievements monitoring worldwide elections and in his
efforts with Habitat for Humanity, building homes for the poor.
Former Vice President Al Gore got the prize after years of working
for the environment. And whether you appreciated Henry Kissinger's
getting the award it was in response to his efforts to effect a peace
in the Vietnam War.
So, at the moment, I believe it is enormously premature for Obama to
be getting this great tribute, which to a certain extent cheapens the
prior recipients and the work all of them performed over so many years.
It is traditional for Nobel honorees to be named a long time after
their achievements in the sciences and literature. Indeed, the winners
announced this week in other categories performed their amazing work
and discoveries decades ago. Obama's designation is akin to giving an
Oscar to a young director for films we hope that he or she will produce
or for a first-time published author getting a Pulitzer for a book he
is destined to write some day.
The time has not yet arrived and circumstances have not yet evolved
where Barack Obama is anywhere near the point where he has earned this
prize. I don't blame him for this capricious action; it was the Nobel
Peace Committee which committed the offense, which no doubt has Alfred
Nobel thumping his head against his casket.
I only hope that President Obama takes this honor to heart to the
extent that his policies and statements and deeds will someday make him
deserving of this singular trophy. However, that time has not yet
arrived, and I fear there will be a backlash to this announcement that
may well lessen the significance this award has generally meant for
well over a century.
Contact Us